Numéros de version

Qui ne s’est jamais pris la tête concernant le numéro de version d’une livraison? Cameron Purdy nous livre sa recette Simple et efficace.

No related posts.

Tags:

2 Responses to “Numéros de version”

  1. eClaire Says:
    April 16th, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    Je ne peux pas accéder à l’adresse clé: Unexpected Exception :( tu as une solution où une autre source?

    merci d’avance :)

  2. Aurélien Pelletier Says:
    April 16th, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    jroller.com semble avoir quelles difficultés… Mais c’est passé après quelques reload. voici ce qu’il écrit:

    A while back, we settled on a release numbering system based on a simple set of rules:

    * A “dot-zero” release (like 3.0) is allowed to drop deprecated APIs, change an API in a manner that could break binary compatibility, or change the JDK version requirement.

    * A “dot-X” release (like 3.1) is only allowed to add features and APIs, but should not break any binary compatibility.

    * A “dot-X-dot-Y” release (like 3.0.1) is a service pack, designed to correct specific problems, and not to introduce new features.

    Over time we’ve found that this system works extraordinarily well because of its simplicity, although it’s not going to get us to version 10.0 anytime soon. (At least I hope not, as that would mean that we were breaking compatibility too often!)

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

Atom

aside

  • "It’s a sterile Disney-fied walled garden surrounded by sharp-toothed lawyers"

    Tim Bray

    - #
  • "ECM is documents pretending to be content and WCM is content pretending to be documents"

    Seth Gottlieb

    - #
  • "running a number of servers on the departmental secretary's credit card; after all, computing resources are just office supplies"

    Michael Nygard

    - #
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes