WS-machiavellian ?

I remember talking with Andrew Layman, one of the SOAP architects at Microsoft. He let slip that it was actually a Microsoft objective to make the standard sufficiently complex that only the tools would read and write this stuff, and not humans. So that was a strategy tax that was imposed by the big companies on some of this technology, where they made it more complicated than it needed to be so they could sell tools.

Tim O’Reilly (source: WS-* vs. the REST )

Related posts:

  1. Architecture orienté ressource au symposium DNG 2008
  2. Google Open
  3. Web2.0 expo Berlin: Killing the organisational chart

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Additional comments powered by BackType

Atom

aside

  • "It’s a sterile Disney-fied walled garden surrounded by sharp-toothed lawyers"

    Tim Bray

    - #
  • "ECM is documents pretending to be content and WCM is content pretending to be documents"

    Seth Gottlieb

    - #
  • "running a number of servers on the departmental secretary's credit card; after all, computing resources are just office supplies"

    Michael Nygard

    - #
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes